I just read the first half of N. T. Wright's book, The Resurrection of the Son of God which is a defense of the historical view of the resurrection of Christ. The book also defends the historical view of the resurrection of the believer. Wright makes a compelling case for the physicality of the resurrection body over against the spiritualizers who deny the physical resurrection.
I have written a lot of papers on the subject of the resurrection of the flesh.
How about a discussion of the historical evidences for the resurrection of Jesus?
Doug
I still believe. This the BLOG of my faith journey. There's a lot of legacy materials in here from when I attended seminary, etc. I don't necessarily agree with myself anymore.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Moving BLOG...
Picking up here .
-
I do think that there is a knock down falsification argument against the most common young earth argument. Let me give it a shot on you and ...
-
I was questioned about the Canon of Scripture by an Orthodox person. The Orthodox/Catholic argument goes something like this: An example of ...
-
The Evangelical Covenant Church has a fairly unique practice when it comes to baptism. Covenant Churches practice both believer and infant ...
No comments:
Post a Comment